UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
|
|
|
Filed
by the Registrant þ
|
|
Filed
by a Party other than the Registrant o
|
|
|
|
Check
the appropriate box:
|
|
|
|
o
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
o
Confidential, for Use of
the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
þ
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
o
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
o
Soliciting Material Pursuant to
§240.14a-12
|
Synalloy
Corporation
(Name of
Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of
Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ No
fee required.
|
|
o Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11.
|
|
|
|
1) Title
of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
|
|
2) Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
|
|
3) Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee
is calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
|
|
|
4) Proposed
maximum aggregate value of
transaction:
|
|
|
|
o
Fee paid previously with preliminary
materials.
|
|
|
|
o
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided
by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the
offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by
registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
|
1) Amount
Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
2) Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement
No.:
|
Post
Office Box 5627
Spartanburg,
South Carolina 29304
April
30, 2009
1.
|
To
elect six directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders
or until their successors are elected and
qualified;
|
2.
|
To
act upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any
adjournment or adjournments
thereof.
|
Cheryl C.
Carter
Secretary
March 27,
2009
CROFT
INDUSTRIAL PARK
POST
OFFICE BOX 5627
SPARTANBURG,
SOUTH CAROLINA 29304
April
30, 2009
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation by the Board of Directors of Synalloy Corporation (the "Company")
of proxies to be voted at the Annual Shareholders' Meeting to be held at the
Company's corporate office, 2155 West Croft Circle, Spartanburg, South Carolina,
on Thursday, April 30, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. local time, and at all adjournment(s)
thereof. On or about March 27, 2009, we will begin mailing these proxy materials
to all shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 2,
2009.
Quorum. The presence, in person or by proxy, of a
majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company is necessary
to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. If a share is represented for any
purpose at the annual meeting by the presence of the registered owner or a
person holding a valid proxy for the registered owner, it is deemed to be
present for purposes of establishing a quorum. Therefore, valid proxies which
are marked "Abstain" or "Withhold" and shares that are not voted, including
proxies submitted by brokers that are the record owners of shares (so-called
"broker non-votes"), will be included in determining the number of votes present
or represented at the annual meeting. If a quorum is not present or represented
at the meeting, the shareholders entitled to vote who are present in person or
represented by proxy have the power to adjourn the meeting from time to time. If
the meeting is to be reconvened within 30 days, no notice of the reconvened
meeting will be given other than an announcement at the adjourned meeting. If
the meeting is to be adjourned for 30 days or more, notice of the reconvened
meeting will be given as provided in the Bylaws. At any reconvened meeting at
which a quorum is present or represented, any business may be transacted that
might have been transacted at the meeting as originally noticed.
Voting Rights. The securities
which can be voted at the Annual Meeting consist of Common Stock of the Company,
$1.00 par value per share. The record date for determining the holders of Common
Stock who are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting is March
2, 2009. On March 2, 2009, the Company had outstanding 6,253,916 (excluding
1,746,084 shares held in treasury) shares of Common Stock. Each share of Common
Stock is entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted on at the meeting,
except that in the election of Directors shareholders have cumulative voting
rights.
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS’
MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 30, 2009
The
Company’s 2008 Annual Report and 2009 Proxy Statement are available via the
Internet at: http://investor.synalloy.com.
ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K
THE
COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Amount
and Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
|
Percent
of Class
|
Tontine
Overseas Associates, L.L.C.
Tontine
Capital Partners, L.P.
Tontine
Capital Management, L.L.C.
Jeffrey
L. Gendell
55
Railroad Avenue
Greenwich,
CT 06830
|
465,754(1)
|
7.45
|
1414
Avenue of the Americas
New
York, NY 10019
|
347,700(2)
|
5.56
|
__________
(1)
|
According
to the Schedule 13G filed February 12, 2009, these entities and Mr.
Gendell expressly affirm that they are acting as members of a group with
respect to these shares. The Schedule 13G further states that: Mr. Jeffrey
L. Gendell is the managing member of Tontine Capital Management, LLC
(“TCM”) and Tontine Overseas Associates, LLC (“TOA”), and in that capacity
directs their operations. TOA serves as investment manager to Tontine
Capital Overseas Master Fund, LP. TCM, the general partner of
Tontine Capital Partners, L.P. (“TCP”) has the power to direct the affairs
of TCP, including decisions respecting the disposition of the proceeds
from the sale of the shares of the Company. Each of the clients
of TOA has the power to direct the receipt of dividends from or the
proceeds of sale of such shares.
|
(2)
|
Royce
& Associates, Inc. ("Royce") is an investment advisor registered with
the Securities & Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisors Act
of 1940.
|
Name
of Beneficial Owner
|
Owned
as of March 2, 2009
|
Percent
of
Class
|
|
216,928(1)
|
3.47
|
|
211,162(2)
|
|
|
82,708(3)
|
1.32
|
|
60,224(4)
|
*
|
|
51,901(5)
|
|
|
42,131(6)
|
*
|
|
30,150(7)
|
|
|
25,026(8)
|
|
|
21,415(8)
|
|
|
741,595(9)
|
11.86
|
__________
1.
|
Includes
26,984 shares held by an IRA; and 93,750 shares owned by his spouse, as to
which Mr. Lane disclaims beneficial ownership.
|
2.
|
Includes
indirect ownership of 35,580 shares held by an IRA; 4,830 held by spouse;
and 11,890 held in custodial accounts for minor children. A total of
153,702 shares are held in a margin account and are pledged as
collateral.
|
3.
|
Includes
39,300 shares which are subject to currently exercisable options; 9,647
shares allocated under the Company's 401(k)/ESOP; and 1,447 shares
allocated to spouse under the Company's 401(k)/ESOP.
|
4.
|
Includes
exercisable options to purchase 6,000 shares.
|
5.
|
Includes
29,593 shares which are subject to currently exercisable options; and
2,735 shares allocated under the Company's 401(k)/ESOP.
|
6.
|
Includes
4,873 shares allocated under the Company's 401(k)/ESOP.
|
7.
|
Includes
18,146 shares which are subject to currently exercisable options; and
4,306 shares allocated under the Company's 401(k)/ESOP.
|
8.
|
Includes
5,605 shares held by spouse which are held in a margin account and may
from time-to-time be pledged as collateral.
|
9.
|
Includes
93,039 shares which are subject to currently exercisable options; and
23,008 shares allocated under the Company's
401(k)/ESOP.
|
Name,
Age, Principal Occupation, Other Directorships and Other
Information
|
Since
|
Mrs.
Fishburn is a graduate of Hollins University, Roanoke, VA. Mrs. Fishburn
is a member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance and Compensation &
Long-Term Incentive Committees
|
1979
|
Mr.
Lane served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 1987 until his
retirement on January 31, 2002. He has served as Chairman of the Board
since 1987 and is a member of the Executive Committee
|
1986
|
Prior
to his retirement, Mr. Vinson was Principal and Managing Member of VH,
LLC, a private real estate investment company from 2000 to
2007. He is a member of the Audit, Executive,
Nominating/Corporate Governance and Compensation & Long-Term Incentive
Committees.
|
1987
|
Mr.
Wright is the founder and managing director of Avitas Capital, LLC, a
closely held investment banking firm, founded in 1999, in Richmond, VA. In
1986, he founded, and is retired as Chief Executive Officer of, the law
firm of Wright, Robinson, Osthimer & Tatum, Richmond, VA. He serves on
the Audit, Nominating/Corporate Governance and Compensation &
Long-Term Incentive Committees.
|
2001
|
Mr.
Bram is the founder and President of Horizon Capital Management, Inc., an
investment advisory firm, founded in 1996, in Richmond, VA. Since 1995, he
has also been a Managing Director with McCammon Group, a mediation and
consulting company based in Richmond, VA. Mr. Bram has been the President
of Bizport, Ltd., a document management company in Richmond, VA, since
2002. Since 1997, Mr. Bram has served as the CFO for TrialNet, Inc., an
electronic billing company based in Richmond, VA. Mr. Bram serves on the
Audit, Compensation and Long-Term Incentive and Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committees.
|
2004
|
Mr.
Braam has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Synalloy
Corporation since January 1, 2006. Since December 1999, he has been
President of the Company's Specialty Chemicals Group, which is comprised
of Manufacturers Chemicals, LLC, Blackman Uhler, LLC, Organic Pigments,
LLC and SFR, LLC, wholly-owned by the Company. Mr. Braam serves on the
Executive Committee.
|
2006
|
Executive
Committee. The members of the Executive Committee are James Lane, Chair,
Carroll Vinson and Ronald Braam. This Committee exercises the authority of the
Board of Directors in the management of the business of the Company between the
meetings of the Board of Directors. However, this Committee does not have, among
other powers, the authority to amend the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws,
to adopt an agreement of merger or consolidation, to recommend to the
shareholders the sale, lease or exchange of the Company's property and assets,
to declare a dividend, or to authorize the issuance of stock. This Committee did
not meet in 2008.
The Audit
Committee members are Carroll Vinson, Chair, Murray Wright and Craig Bram. The
Audit Committee acts pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board of
Directors which is available on the Company's website at: www.synalloy.com. Each
member of the Audit Committee is independent as defined in the NASDAQ Rules. The
Audit Committee held six meetings during the year. During these meetings, the
Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements to be
included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, reviewed and discussed the
Forms 10-Q for each quarter with management and the independent auditors prior
to filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), met independently
with the independent auditors, interviewed and selected the independent
auditors, reviewed the Audit Committee Charter and had oversight of the
development and implementation of the Company's Code of Conduct.
composition
of the Board of Directors and evaluating and recommending candidates for
election to the Company's Board. This Committee also reviews and oversees
corporate governance issues and makes recommendations to the Board related to
the adoption of policies pursuant to rules of the SEC, the NASDAQ, and other
governing authorities, and as required by the Sarbanes Oxley Act. This Committee
met once in 2008.
In
recommending and evaluating candidates, the Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee takes into consideration such factors as it deems appropriate based on
the Company's current needs. These factors may include diversity, age, skills
such as understanding of appropriate technologies and general finance,
decision-making ability, inter-personal skills, experience with businesses and
other organizations of comparable size, and the interrelationship between the
candidate's experience and business background and other Board members'
experience and business background. Additionally, candidates for director should
possess the highest personal and professional ethics, and they should be
committed to the long-term interests of the shareholders.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will consider as
potential Board of Directors' nominees persons recommended by shareholders if
the following requirements are met. If a shareholder wishes to recommend a
director candidate to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee for
consideration as a Board of Directors' nominee, the shareholder must submit in
writing to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee the recommended
candidate's name, a brief resume setting forth the recommended candidate's
business and educational background and qualifications for service, the number
of the Company's shares beneficially owned by the person, and a notarized
consent signed by the recommended candidate stating the recommended candidate's
willingness to be nominated and to serve. Additionally, the recommending
shareholder must provide his or her name and address and the number of the
Company's shares beneficially owned by such person. This information must be
delivered to the Secretary of the Company at Post Office Box 5627, Spartanburg,
South Carolina 29304 or Croft Industrial Park, Spartanburg, South Carolina
29302, for transmission to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, and
must be received not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Committee may request further information if
it determines a potential candidate may be an appropriate nominee. Director
candidates recommended by shareholders that comply with these requirements will
receive the same consideration that the Committee's candidates receive. The
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee routinely meets at the regular
quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors next preceding the Annual Meeting.
Name,
Age and Principal Position and Five-Year Business
Experience
|
Chief Financial Officer and Vice
President, Finance since May 1994
|
Cheryl
C. Carter, age 58
Corporate Secretary since June
1987.
|
Michael
D. Boling, age 54
President of Bristol Metals, LLC,
a subsidiary of the Company, since October 1, 2005; Vice President of
Bristol Metals' Piping Systems unit from 1987 to
2005.
|
further
described below. Taken together, they fit the Company’s business
model to achieve its long-term goals. Each element addresses
different considerations, and without one or more of the elements, our long-term
goals might not be achievable.
Given the
fact that our manufacturing businesses have, in the past, been cyclical, the
Company has attempted to attract and retain the best available talent at the low
end of the industry base compensation scale. It is important for the
Company to remain competitive with not only its domestic competition, but also
its competitors participating in world markets. Therefore, the
Company attempts at all levels of management and operations to control costs so
that the Company can strive for a relatively low base cost
structure. This provides a cushion for the Company in times of
reduced profitability.
However,
in order to remain competitive in the executive workforce marketplace and
attract the talented executives the Company needs, notwithstanding the lower
relative base compensation, the Company believes it is necessary to provide
enhancement to base compensation when targeted levels of profitability are
achieved. Accordingly, the Company maintains short- and long-term
incentive compensation programs that tend to be somewhat more generous than
those of some of its industry peers.
The three
elements of executive compensation are more fully described below, as are the
methods used in determining their values.
Base
Compensation. The Committee determines base salaries by
considering market forces in the area, and in the industry applicable to each
business unit. For the reasons discussed above, base salaries are set
toward the low end of a range defined by our peers of comparable size and in
related industries.
In
addition to peer group information, the Company considers the attributes of each
individual executive, including but not limited to his or her longevity with the
Company, his or her educational background and experience, the particular
responsibilities of his or her position, the compensation of others with similar
background, credentials and responsibilities, and his or her past level of
performance, as well as prospective assumptions.
Short-Term Incentive
Compensation. As discussed above, in order for the lower
relative base compensation approach to be effective, the Company
maintains a cash incentive program which tends to be somewhat more generous than
that of our peers when profits are robust, and pays the employees nothing unless
minimum returns on average shareholders’ equity are achieved. The
cash incentive program compensates each manager eligible for such incentive
compensation pursuant to a formula based upon returns on average equity in his
business unit during the year. The intention is to make every senior
manager’s cash compensation dependent upon measurable objective performance
criteria. Subsidiary senior managers participate in profit sharing
pools determined by the performance of their business units, while the Chief
Executive Officer’s incentive compensation is based on consolidated
profitability.
The
formula employed with respect to the cash incentive program is to award an
incentive pool to each business unit in an amount equal to 10% of operating
income in excess of a threshold of 10% return on average shareholders’ equity
employed in the business units. A minimum of 60% of the incentive
will be paid to designated participants pro rata to their salaries. A
maximum of 30% of the incentive pool may be distributed to employees who are not
designated participants and a minimum of 10% and a maximum of 40% of the
incentive pool may be paid to designated participants in any proportion as
recommended by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Compensation
& Long-Term Incentive Committee. Other senior managers at the
Company’s headquarters, including the Chief Financial Officer, the Corporate
Secretary and other senior executives, receive cash bonuses based upon their
individual performance as determined by the Chief Executive Officer and the
Compensation Committee & Long-Term Incentive Committee. In the
past, cash bonuses have varied from a small percentage of the amount of cash
bonuses allocated to the operating business units, to as much as 20% of that
amount, depending upon specific circumstances. There is no maximum or
minimum amount currently established for these individuals, but there has been
an indirect linkage between the size of the cash bonus pool, and the amounts
allocated to these individuals. The Chief Executive Officer’s cash bonus is
specified in his employment contract, which extends through December 31, 2009
and is automatically extended for an additional year unless either party gives
90 days
advance
notice of intention to cancel the agreement. The employment contract provides
a cash bonus equal to 5% of operating income before income taxes in
excess of an amount equal to 10% of average stockholders' equity.
Long-Term Incentive
Compensation. The Company also provides to senior
managers a long-term incentive component to compensation. In 2004 and
prior years, this component took the form of stock options pursuant to incentive
stock option plans adopted in 1988 and 1998. For 2005 and future
years, the Compensation & Long-Term Incentive Committee of the Board of
Directors has recommended, and shareholders approved, awarding incentives
through grants of restricted stock under the 2005 Stock Awards
Plan. Grants of restricted shares instead of options are expected to
benefit the Company in that such grants avoid the complicating issues of
accounting for the cost of option grants and reduce the potential dilution to
existing shareholders, while exposing the grantees to both the positive and
negative aspects of changes in market price of the Company’s common stock over
time. Grants of restricted stock augment the cash component of compensation in a
number of ways. The grants vest in 20% increments over a period of
five years from the date of grant as long as the employee remains employed by
the Company. Over time, the program provides an incentive for the
executive to remain with the Company in the long term, as vesting depends upon
continued employment. Goals are prospective, and the executives are
made aware, annually, of the Company’s long-term values and
expectations. Cash compensation is necessarily focused in the near
term. Long-term incentive compensation is focused largely on the
future.
In
allocating between cash and equity compensation, the Compensation &
Long-Term Incentive Committee has taken into account the fact that the costs of
stock grants under the Plan are a tax deductible expense to the Company measured
on the date of vesting, whereas cash compensation is a direct expense to the
Company in the time frame dictated by applicable accounting rules.
The
granting of awards under the 2005 Stock Awards Plan begins with a determination
by the Chief Executive Officer and the Compensation & Long-Term Incentive
Committee of the dollar value of the stock available to be awarded for
performance in a given year. The awards are made the following year and the
total number of restricted shares available to be awarded is determined by
dividing the previously determined dollar value of available stock by the
average of the high and low sales prices on the trading day immediately prior to
the determination date. The number of shares so determined is the maximum number
that may be awarded to all participants for the prior year’s
performance.
The Chief
Executive Officer and the Compensation & Long-Term Incentive Committee also
agree at the beginning of the performance year upon specific milestones, largely
comprised of measurable business metrics which can be impacted by management.
These goals are established and communicated to managers in February or March of
each year. The Committee reviews progress towards the goals during the
performance year and evaluates performance after the end of the year. Based on
its evaluation, the Committee awards restricted shares to the participants as it
deems appropriate.
The
Committee has and uses its discretion to determine the number of shares awarded
to each named executive officer. The Committee does not use multiple levels of
performance which are tied to multiple levels of awards. Rather, it subjectively
evaluates the extent to which an executive officer has achieved or made progress
toward achieving the officer’s goals after considering the available data and it
then uses its collective judgment to make awards it believes to be appropriate
to the level of performance.
Corporate
goals for 2008 included both financial and operating
targets. Financial targets included, among others, revenue and profit
growth, return on invested capital, and cost control. Operating
targets included, among others, customer relationship issues, product quality
and plant process efficiency.
No
restricted stock grants were made in 2005. A total of 22,510 stock grants were
made in February 2007 against a potential grant of 45,000 shares for 2006 plan
participants’ performance. Goals for 2007 were established and communicated to
plan participants early in 2007. Based on the Company’s achieving its goals and
executive officers achieving their individual goals in 2007, a total of 11,480
stock grants were made against a potential grant of 24,465 shares at the
Committee’s meeting in February 2008. Likewise, goals were established in 2008
and quarterly reports on progress toward goals were produced by each business
unit and senior management, and communicated to the
Committee
for review. In February 2009, the Committee evaluated each business unit and
senior management with respect to 2008 performance versus goals. As a result of
this evaluation process, the Committee declared an award of 5,500 restricted
shares to plan participants against a potential grant of 76,628 shares. The
awards for 2008 were smaller than in previous years due to the level of
achievement being lower, relative to goals.
The
Committee has deferred setting a value of stock awards for 2009 pending revision
of the criteria for awards to senior management The Committee’s
goal is to apply certain common goals across all levels of senior management, in
addition to specific goals within their area of responsibility, as in the past.
The size of the grant pool may rise or fall over time, depending on the
long-term performance of the Company. The Committee’s focus in setting this
element of compensation is to achieve an appropriate balance among the three
elements of executive compensation. Awards are granted in February so
that the Committee has time to evaluate prior year goals against performance,
and also to enable the participants to have the earliest possible awareness of
what their goals are for the ensuing year. The Company does not
employ a “claw back” or similar technique to reduce existing awards if
performance falters in future years; instead, the goals are intended to induce
continued improvement, and grading is rigorous. The entire system is
intended to induce consistent and improving performance over time.
Other
Matters. Executive officers make recommendations with respect
to salaries of their subordinates. The Compensation & Long-Term
Incentive Committee sets the salaries of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary and the head of each business
unit.
The
Committee reviews all forms of executive compensation annually, and, based on
its experience with this system, believes that is fair to the employees, and the
Company, over time. The Committee also believes that the system
provides motivation for employees to maximize shareholder value over the long
term.
The
process outlined above describes the mechanics of determining executive
compensation at the Company in 2008. The Committee contemplates no
major changes in the process for 2009.
Sibyl
N. Fishburn
Craig
C. Bram
Carroll
D. Vinson
Name
and Principal Position
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards ($)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation ($)
|
|
|
All
Other Compensation ($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
Ronald
H. Braam
|
2008
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,744 |
|
|
$ |
165,873 |
|
|
$ |
9,200 |
|
|
$ |
404,817 |
|
President
and CEO
|
2007
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
526,381 |
|
|
|
11,926 |
|
|
|
813,307 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383,162 |
|
|
|
13,853 |
|
|
|
597,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory
M. Bowie
|
2008
|
|
$ |
178,333 |
|
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
24,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,200 |
|
|
$ |
302,275 |
|
CFO
|
2007
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
396,500 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,800 |
|
|
|
283,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
D. Boling
|
2008
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,187 |
|
|
$ |
221,169 |
|
|
$ |
9,200 |
|
|
$ |
403,556 |
|
President
of Bristol
|
2007
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,000 |
|
|
|
506,119 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
784,119 |
|
Metals,
LLC subsidiary
|
2006
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
8,800 |
|
|
|
508,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheryl
C. Carter
|
2008
|
|
$ |
88,833 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
13,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,689 |
|
|
$ |
132,907 |
|
Corporate
Secretary
|
2007
|
|
|
83,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
31,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,720 |
|
|
|
168,970 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
119,200 |
|
Bonuses - Mr. Bowie
and Ms. Carter are paid a discretionary cash bonus based on various
considerations, including the Company's financial results, compensation of other
executive officers and an evaluation of their job performance. For more
information on cash bonus compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and
Analysis – Short-Term Incentive Compensation.”
Stock Awards – The
information in this column relates to restricted stock awards. The amounts in
this column represent the dollar amounts recognized for financial statement
reporting purposes with respect to the fiscal year in accordance with
FAS 123(R). The assumptions made in the valuation of these awards are set forth
in Note J to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended
January 3, 2009, which are included in the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
excess of
a predetermined percentage (10% for 2008) of average stockholders' equity. For
more information on short-term incentive compensation, see the “Compensation
Discussion and Analysis – Short-Term Incentive Compensation.”
GRANTS
OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
Name (a)
|
Grant
Date (b)
|
|
Estimated
Possible Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(1)
|
|
|
All
Other Stock Awards Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) (2)
|
|
|
Exercise
or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)
|
|
|
Grant
Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
($) (g)
|
|
|
Maximum
($) (h)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
(k)
|
|
|
(l)
|
|
Ronald
H. Braam
|
2/12/2008
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
$ |
13.52 |
|
|
$ |
29,744 |
|
Gregory
M. Bowie
|
2/12/2008
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
|
13.52 |
|
|
|
24,742 |
|
Michael
D. Boling
|
2/12/2008
|
|
$ |
91,061 |
|
|
$ |
285,325 |
|
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
13.52 |
|
|
|
23,187 |
|
Cheryl
C. Carter
|
2/12/2008
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
13.52 |
|
|
|
13,385 |
|
(2) Awards
of restricted shares to the named executives in 2008 pursuant to the 2005 Stock
Awards Plan based on achievement of pre-determined quantifiable and qualitative
goals during 2007. The shares vest in 20% increments beginning one year from
date of grant, and any unvested shares are forfeited upon termination of
employment. Dividends accrue and are paid to named executives upon vesting of
any portion of the restricted stock.
Awards of
restricted shares were also made on February 12, 2009 to the named executives
pursuant to the 2005 Stock Awards Plan for 2008 performance. Under the Plan
awards of restricted stock were made to certain key executives based on
achievement of pre-determined quantifiable and qualitative goals during 2008 as
follows: Mr. Braam – 1,000 shares, Mr. Bowie – 1,500; and Ms. Carter – 1,000
shares. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis for more information on
long-term incentive compensation.
(3)
Computed in accordance with FAS 123(R).
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)
Unexercisable
|
|
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised
Unearned Options (#)
|
|
Option
Exercise Price ($)
|
|
Option
Expiration Date (1)
|
|
Number
of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (2)
(#)
|
|
|
Market
Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (3)
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
Ronald
H. Braam
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
$ |
7.75 |
|
4/29/2009
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
$ |
23,000 |
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
7.282 |
|
12/1/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
4/25/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
9.96 |
|
2/3/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory
M. Bowie
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
$ |
7.75 |
|
4/29/2009
|
|
|
3,830 |
|
|
$ |
19,150 |
|
|
|
|
15,093 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
9.96 |
|
2/3/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
D. Boling
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,523 |
|
|
$ |
27,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheryl
C. Carter
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
$ |
7.75 |
|
4/29/2009
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
$ |
9,950 |
|
|
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
4/25/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,546 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
|
9.96 |
|
2/3/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________
(1)
Options expiring April 29, 2009, vested as follows: 20% beginning April 29,
2000, 40% at April 29, 2001, 60% at April 29, 2002, 80% at April 20, 2003 and
100% at April 20, 2004. Stock options expiring April 25, 2012 vested as follows:
20% beginning on April 25, 2003, 40% at April 25, 2004, 60% at April 25, 2005,
and the remaining 12,800 shares granted to the named executive officers vested
on December 20, 2005 as a result of the Board of Directors' resolution to
accelerate the vesting schedules of substantially all outstanding unvested
options issued to officers and key employees effective as of the date of the
resolution. Options expiring February 3, 2015 vest as follows: 16,454 options
granted vested on December 20, 2005 as a result of a Board of Directors'
resolution to accelerate the vesting schedules described above; no options
vested in 2006; 6,201 shares vested on February 3, 2007 for Messrs. Braam and
Bowie; 7,000 options vested on February 3, 2008 for Messrs. Braam and Bowie;
7,000 options will vest on February 3, 2009 for Messrs. Braam and Bowie; and
7,000 options for Messrs. Braam and Bowie and 1,454 options for Ms. Carter will
vest on February 3, 2010.
(2)
Includes restricted stock awards granted February 12, 2007 of which 20% vest
annually beginning February 12, 2008; and restricted stock awards granted
February 12, 2008 of which 20% vest annually beginning February 12, 2009. Stock
awards are subject to the recipient’s continuing to be employed by the Company
and other conditions described under “Equity Plans—Stock Awards Plan”
below.
(3) Based
on the January 2, 2009 closing stock price of $5.00 per share.
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)
|
|
|
Value
Realized on Vesting ($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
Ronald
H. Braam
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
$ |
8,112 |
|
Gregory
M. Bowie
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
6,760 |
|
Michael
D. Boling
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
12,871 |
|
Cheryl
C. Carter
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
3,380 |
|
Non-employee directors are paid an annual retainer of $35,000,
and each director has the opportunity to elect to receive $15,000 of the
retainer in restricted stock. For 2008 and 2009, each director elected to
receive $15,000 of the annual retainer in restricted stock. The number of
restricted shares issued is determined by the average of the high and low stock
price on the day prior to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In 2008 each
non-employee director received 959 shares of restricted stock (an aggregate of
4,795 shares). The shares granted to the directors are not registered under the
Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to forfeiture in whole or in part upon
the occurrence of certain events. In addition, directors are compensated $1,500
for each board meeting attended in person; $1,000 for each telephone Board
meeting; and $1,000 for attendance at committee meetings not held on Board
meeting days. The Chairman of the Board and the Audit Committee Chair receive
additional annual compensation of $5,000 each; and the Compensation &
Long-Term Incentive Committee Chair receives annual compensation of $2,500.
Directors are reimbursed for travel and other expenses related to attendance at
meetings. Directors who are employees are not paid extra compensation for
service on the Board or any committee of the Board.
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
James
G. Lane, Jr.
|
|
$ |
48,000 |
|
|
$ |
48,000 |
|
Sibyl
N. Fishburn
|
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
|
43,000 |
|
Carroll
D. Vinson
|
|
|
53,000 |
|
|
|
53,000 |
|
Murray
H. Wright
|
|
|
50,500 |
|
|
|
50,500 |
|
Craig
C. Bram
|
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
|
48,000 |
|
__________
(1) As
discussed above, each director elected to be paid $15,000 of his annual retainer
in stock (959 shares each).
The agreement also provides that Mr. Braam will be entitled to
participate in all employee benefit plans in accordance with the terms of those
plans. In the event of Mr. Braam's permanent disability or death while employed
by the Company, he will be entitled to a payment equal to his current base
salary at the date of death or disability until the next anniversary date of the
agreement, which shall in no event be less than three months, together with his
bonus compensation for that fiscal year prorated to the date of termination of
his employment as a result of permanent disability or death. If Mr. Braam's
employment with the Company had terminated on January 3, 2009, as a result of
his permanent disability or death, he would have been entitled to a payment of
$50,000 with respect to his base salary and $165,873 with respect to his
short-term cash incentive compensation. The agreement contains Mr. Braam's
covenant not to engage, directly or indirectly, in competition with the Company
with respect to the businesses in which it is engaged on the date his employment
is terminated for a period of one year after termination of his employment. Mr.
Braam also agrees not to disclose, at any time during his employment with the
Company or thereafter, any of the Company's confidential
information.
The Company has two stock option plans. Both plans were approved
by shareholders and the 1998 Plan is an incentive stock option plan. Both plans
had ten year terms and have terminated, and no further grants may be made under
either plan. The Company did not grant any options during 2008, 2007 or 2006.
Under the 1998 Plan covering officers and key employees, options were
exercisable beginning one year after date of grant at a rate of 20% annually on
a cumulative basis, and unexercised options expire ten years from the grant
date. Under the 1994 Non-Employee Directors’ Plan, options were exercisable at
the date of grant. Currently, there are options outstanding under the both
plans. The grant period for the 1994 Plan expired in April 2004, but options may
be exercised under the 1994 Plan until April 2012. The grant period
for the 1998 Plan expired April 30, 2008, but options may be exercised under
this Plan until February 2015. The exercise price for options granted under
these plans is 100% of the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock on
the date the option was granted. Certain restrictions exist as to the time in
which options can be exercised. In the event that (a) all or substantially all
of the assets or Common Stock of the Company (or a subsidiary or division of the
Company in which the option holder is employed) are/is sold to an entity not
affiliated with the Company, or (b) a merger or share exchange with an
unaffiliated party occurs in which the Company is not the surviving entity, an
option holder may exercise, in addition to the above, 50% of the options not
otherwise exercisable because of the vesting period requirement, subject to
certain limitations. If one of the events described in (a) or (b) above had
occurred as of January 3, 2009, half of the options shown in the ‘Number of
Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable” column of the
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End 2008 table would have vested
immediately.
Incentive
stock options are not transferable other than by death and can only be exercised
during the employee's lifetime by the employee. Under the 1994 Plan, in the
event a person ceases to be a non-employee director for reasons other than
death, the unexpired options must be exercised by the earlier of three years
after termination of
Board
service not to exceed 10 years after date of grant. On December 20, 2005, the
Board of Directors elected to accelerate vesting of 44,144 outstanding unvested
stock options under the 1998 Stock Option Plan. At March 2, 2009, there were
128,243 options outstanding under both plans of which 98,789 were exercisable.
The 2005 Stock Awards Plan, approved by shareholders at the
April 28, 2005 Annual Meeting, and amended by the Board of Directors effective
at its February 2008 meeting, authorizes issuance of up to 300,000 shares which
may be awarded for a period of ten years from the effective date of the plan.
Stock awards will vest in 20% increments annually on a cumulative basis,
beginning one year after the date of grant. In order for the awards to vest, the
employee must be in the continuous employment of the Company or a subsidiary
since the date of the award. Any portion of an award that has not vested will be
forfeited upon termination of employment. The Company may also terminate any
portion of an award that has not vested upon an employee's failure to comply
with all conditions of the award or the plan. Vesting of up to 50% of awards
will automatically accelerate in the event of (i) a sale of all or substantially
all of the assets of the Company (or a subsidiary or division of the Company in
which the employee is employed) to an entity not affiliated with the Company,
(ii) a merger or share exchange with an unaffiliated party in which the Company
is not the surviving entity, or (iii) a similar sale or exchange transaction
that, in the Committee's sole discretion, justifies such vesting. If one of the
events described in (i), (ii) or (iii) above had occurred as of January 3, 2009,
half of the restricted shares shown in the “Number of Shares or Units that have
not Vested” column of the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year Ended 2008
table would have vested immediately.
Shares
representing awards that have not yet vested will be held in escrow by the
Company and an employee will not be entitled to any voting rights with respect
to any such shares. Share awards that have not vested will not be
transferable.
The Board
of Directors implemented an equity-based incentive compensation program pursuant
to which it reserved 45,000 shares under the 2005 Stock Awards Plan for
potential grant in 2007 to officers, including the named executive officers in
the Summary Compensation Table, and certain key employees if they achieved
pre-determined quantifiable and qualitative goals during 2006. As explained in
connection with the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table, on February 12, 2007 a
total of 22,510 restricted shares were awarded under this incentive program, of
which 11,510 were awarded to the named executive officers, based on meeting
pre-disclosed 2006 goals. Of these restricted share awards, 4,136 shares vested
on February 12, 2008.
At its
February 2007 meeting, the Compensation & Long-Term Incentive Committee set
a number of shares with a market value on the date of grant of $400,000 under
the Plan to ultimately be denominated in restricted shares for potential grants
to officers and managers for 2007, including the named executive officers in the
compensation table, subject to achieving pre-determined quantifiable and
qualitative goals during 2007. On February 12, 2008, the Committee granted
11,480 restricted shares, of which 6,735 were awarded to the named executive
officers, based on their achieving these goals in 2007.
At its
February 2008 meeting, the Compensation & Long-Term Incentive Committee
again set a number of shares with a market value on the date of grant of
$400,000 under the Plan to ultimately be denominated in restricted shares for
potential grants to officers and managers for 2008, including the named
executive officers in the compensation table, subject to achieving
pre-determined quantifiable and qualitative goals during 2008. As explained in
connection with the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table, on February 12, 2009, a
total of 5,500 shares were awarded under this incentive program, of which 3,500
were awarded to the named executive officers, based on meeting the pre-disclosed
2008 goals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2007
|
|
|
%
of Total
|
|
|
|
$ |
269,500 |
|
|
|
88 |
% |
|
$ |
290,000 |
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
Fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
compliance/preparation
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Total
Fees
|
|
$ |
305,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
320,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
authority
to pre-approve audit and permissible non-audit services, provided such
pre-approval decision is presented to the full Committee at its next scheduled
meeting. During 2008, all audit and permitted non-audit services were
pre-approved by the Committee.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and
discussed with management the Company's audited financial statements for the
year ended January 3, 2009. The Audit Committee has discussed with the Company's
independent auditors, Dixon Hughes PLLC, the matters required to be discussed by
SAS 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU Section 380) as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T. The
Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from
Dixon Hughes, required by applicable requirements of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications
with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Dixon
Hughes, their independence. Based on the review and discussions referred to
above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the
audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended January 3, 2009 for filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Carroll
D. Vinson, Chair
Murray
H. Wright
Craig
C. Bram
Any shareholder proposal to be included in the proxy materials
for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be submitted in accordance with
applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and received by
the Company at its principal executive offices, Croft Industrial Park, PO Box
5627, Spartanburg, SC 29304, no later than November 27, 2009. In order for a
shareholder to bring any business or nominations before the 2010 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders, certain conditions set forth in the Company's Bylaws must be
complied with, including but not limited to, the delivery of a notice to the
Secretary of the Company not less than 30 nor more than 60 days in advance of
the 2010 Annual Meeting which is tentatively scheduled on April 29, 2010. With
respect to any shareholder proposal not received by the Company prior to
February 10, 2010, the designated proxy agents will vote on the proposal in
their discretion.
Cheryl
C. Carter
Secretary
PROXY CARD
SYNALLOY
CORPORATION
POST
OFFICE BOX 5627, SPARTANBURG, SC 29304
This
Proxy is Solicited by The Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders on April 30, 2009
The
undersigned hereby appoints Gregory M. Bowie and Cheryl C. Carter, or either of
them, each with power of substitution, as lawful proxy, to vote all the
shares of Common Stock of Synalloy Corporation which the undersigned would be
entitled to vote if personally present at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of
Synalloy Corporation to be held at its corporate offices, 2155 West Croft
Circle, Spartanburg, South Carolina 29302 on Thursday, April 30, 2009 at 10:00
a.m. local time, and at any adjournment thereof, upon such business as may
properly come before the meeting.
The
proxies will vote on the items set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting and
Proxy Statement (receipt of which is hereby acknowledged) as specified on this
card, and are authorized to vote in their discretion when a vote is not
specified. If no specification is made, it is the intention of said proxies to
vote the shares represented by the proxy in favor of the proposal.
This
proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the
undersigned stockholder. If no direction is made, this Proxy will be voted FOR
election of all the director nominees in proposal 1.
.
Internet - Access "www.voteproxy.com" and follow
the on-screen instructions. Have your proxy card available when you access the
web page, and use the Company Number and Account Number shown on your proxy
card.
Vote
online until 11:59 PM EST the day before the meeting.
Mail - Date, sign and mail
your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.
In Person - You may vote your
shares in person by attending the Annual Meeting.
NOTICE
OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL:
The
Notice of Meeting, proxy statement and proxy card are available at
http://investor.synalloy.com
Please
sign, date and return your proxy card promptly in the enclosed envelope. Please
mark your vote in blue or black ink as shown here. X
Proposal
1. Election of Directors
|
|
|
____
|
For
All Nominees
|
Nominees
|
|
|
___
|
Sibyl
N. Fishburn
|
____
|
Withhold
Authority For All Nominees
|
___
|
James
G. Lane, Jr.
|
|
|
___
|
Ronald
H. Braam
|
____
|
For
All Except
|
___
|
Craig
C. Bram
|
|
(See
Instructions below)
|
___
|
Carroll
D. Vinson
|
|
|
___
|
Murray
H. Wright
|
Instructions:
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s) mark 'FOR ALL EXCEPT' and fill in
the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown
here.
2. Upon
any other matter that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment
thereof, as the proxies in their discretion may determine.
To change
the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new
address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered
name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Signature Date Signature
if held
jointly Date
Please
sign exactly as your name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign.
Trustees, executors, administrators and others signing in a representative
capacity should indicate that capacity. An authorized officer may sign on behalf
of a corporation and should indicate the name of the corporation and his
capacity.